Industry Knowledge
Prior context on the textile sector — its commercial cycles, buyer behaviour and the role of certifications in supplier selection.
Redesigning the digital presence of a textile manufacturing group.
A web design and information architecture case study focused on clarifying business communication, improving content structure and strengthening B2B credibility for two textile manufacturing companies.
Tenoar and Matexsur are part of a broader textile manufacturing group operating in a B2B market — supplying fabrics and finished goods to industrial clients. Their work sits behind the scenes of brands their customers know well, but their own digital presence didn't reflect the depth of their operation.
Textile manufacturing, with vertical capabilities across production, finishing and distribution.
Industrial textile products serving multiple downstream sectors — sold by specification rather than by self-service catalog.
B2B buyers: procurement teams, technical specifiers and partner brands evaluating suppliers before initiating long-term commercial relationships.
The group needed a digital presence aligned with the seriousness of its manufacturing operation — credible enough to support sales conversations and clear enough to communicate capability at a glance.
The starting point wasn't a missing feature or a broken funnel — it was a credibility gap. The websites told a smaller story than the business deserved.
The existing sites did not communicate what made the group different from other manufacturers.
Information was scattered across pages with overlapping topics and no clear hierarchy.
The depth of manufacturing capability was buried under generic copy and stock visuals.
Pages read like a default supplier site — interchangeable with any other competitor.
The visual language no longer matched the maturity of the underlying operation.
Without a formal research phase, the project leaned on what was already known about the sector. The work below replaces the usual "research" deliverables with industry-grounded thinking.
Prior context on the textile sector — its commercial cycles, buyer behaviour and the role of certifications in supplier selection.
Understanding how a vertical manufacturing operation describes its own capabilities, and what specifiers actually look for.
Familiarity with the segment's reference points — what credibility looks like in B2B textile manufacturing.
Structured review of comparable manufacturers to identify shared patterns, blind spots and opportunities to differentiate.
A short, focused review of three comparable manufacturers — enough to support design decisions, not a full competitive audit.
Strong product visibility and straightforward navigation, but limited storytelling around manufacturing capabilities and company expertise.
Clear brand personality and product presentation, though the broader business value proposition is less prominent.
Extensive product catalog and category structure, but the experience prioritizes products over company differentiation and manufacturing credibility.
Most competitors focused heavily on product catalogs and individual items.
Few clearly communicated:
These observations helped shape the content hierarchy, positioning strategy and communication approach used for the Tenoar and Matexsur redesigns.
A new structure was defined around what a B2B buyer actually needs to evaluate the group: what they make, how they make it, and who is behind the operation.
Rather than starting from visual references, the design strategy mapped each problem identified earlier to a concrete decision about the new site.
The redesign is not a product or interface exercise. The visual direction exists to support a clearer story about manufacturing capability, product quality and B2B trust.
The redesign aims to communicate the following through structure, tone and imagery — not through decorative UI:
Position decades of textile know-how as the foundation of every page.
Let materials, finishes and specifications speak for themselves.
Communicate capacity, facilities and production reach to B2B buyers.
Surface responsible-manufacturing efforts as part of the core narrative.
Speak the language of procurement, partners and industry peers.
The clearest way to show what changed is to put the homepages side by side — the single page that carries most of the positioning weight.
A focused selection of key pages from both sites — enough to communicate the design outcome without documenting every screen.
The redesigned websites were launched as public-facing platforms to better communicate the capabilities, products and expertise of both companies.
No analytics or conversion numbers are claimed here. The outcomes are qualitative and structural, focused on what the site now communicates and how it is organised.
The group's identity and offer are no longer buried — the site states what it does and for whom on first read.
Manufacturing capability is described in a way that respects the buyer's intelligence.
Certifications, process and facilities are surfaced where they actually influence buying decisions.
A clean information architecture replaces the previous overlapping topics and dead-ends.
The visual language now matches the seriousness and scale of the underlying operation.
Working without formal user research sharpened the need to anchor every decision in business context. With no interview transcripts to point to, the reasoning had to be explicit at every step.
Familiarity with B2B textile manufacturing shaped the information architecture, the weight given to certifications, and the tone of the copy — choices a generic brief would not have produced.
A second pass would introduce lightweight qualitative validation — short conversations with real specifiers — to pressure-test the positioning and copy against actual buyer language.
FS.dk was built on a research-led discovery process. Tenoar & Matexsur was built on industry context, information architecture and design decisions. Both are valid, but they ask different things of the designer.